|
According to conventional wisdom, comets are left over
from the formation of our solar system. Expectations
in this regard have shaped our theories, but the trouble
is that ongoing discoveries continually challenge the
'Dirty Snowball' model. The copper projectile, Deep
impact, was recently crashed into comet Tempel 1 and
the results have produced further 'big surprises', although
they lend strong support to EU theories, and were in
fact predicted by Wal Thornhill. See links below.
NASA scientists were astonished and expressed their
amazement on camera and in no uncertain terms: "The
blast was considerably more energetic than I expected...”,
“The big question is how did we make such a big
splash...”, “I’m at a loss to explain
it...”
The results still require further analysis, and this
could take some time, but the bright and frequent outflarings,
together with the much brighter than expected pre-impact
and impact flashes strongly support EU predictions.
An additional electrical component to comets would explain
these.
Moreover, little ice/water has thus far been detected
from the impact. In a splendid display of sophistry,
some in the mainstream have now re-dubbed comets as
'Snowy Dirtballs' and even 'Powdery Fluffballs'. Whatever
next? Giant balls of cheese?
Further, from Thunderbolts - Comets:
The Loose Thread
"...'If astronomy were a science,'as
one astronomer put it, theoreticians would admit that
the theory had been falsified, and they would start
over with an eye to the evidence. Instead, they hang
on to the theory with ever more stubbornness and hope
a little tinkering and adjusting will bring the facts
into line..."
From Wal Thornhill's Electric Universe: Comet
Tails of the Expected
|
